Subscribe or upgrade your account to read:

Prince Andrew repaid own charity after queries from regulator

Prince Andrew

Prince Andrew repaid own charity after queries from regulator

Charity Commission intervened over £350,000 of payments to Duke of York’s private secretary

Prince Andrew has been off public duties since a furore over his links with Jeffrey Epstein © AFP via Getty Images

Prince Andrew has suffered further embarrassment after the charities regulator questioned £350,000 of payments to his former private secretary.

The affair is the latest setback for the Duke of York, the Queen’s third child, who has been off public duties since a furore over his links with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

It comes after news that the prince and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson — who remains a close friend — are in a legal dispute about an outstanding £5m payment for a chalet in Verbier, Switzerland, first reported by the Daily Mail on Thursday. 

The Charity Commission, which regulates non-profit organisations in England and Wales, intervened over payments made to Amanda Thirsk, Prince Andrew’s long-serving private secretary who left shortly after his disastrous interview with BBC Newsnight last year.

Ms Thirsk was a trustee of the prince’s umbrella organisation, the Prince Andrew Charitable Trust (PACT), as well as a director of its profitmaking subsidiaries, including Pitch@Palace, his venture for introducing entrepreneurs and investors. The Charity Commission tightly controls the use of philanthropic funds to pay trustees.

The chalet owned by Prince Andrew, Duke of York, and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson in the Swiss resort of Verbier © AFP via Getty Images

According to PACT’s annual report, the regulator “raised a concern about remuneration paid to one of the Trustees . . . which the Commission considered to be an unauthorised Trustee benefit”. As a result, a total of £355,297 — relating to five years of payments to Ms Thirsk — was repaid by the Duke of York’s household.

The matter was raised by PACT’s trustees in correspondence to the Charity Commission; the commission made no suggestion of wrongdoing by Ms Thirsk. Buckingham Palace and Ms Thirsk declined to comment.

“Most charities are supersensitive to the need to comply with the strict laws around trustee benefit,” said Jolyon Maugham QC, a barrister. “It is unfathomable to me that a grown-up charity like Prince Andrew’s Charitable Trust got this so wrong.”

The affair shines a light on Prince Andrew’s unusual finances. He does not receive a direct public grant and instead has relied on income from his commercial activities.

Pitch@Palace rose to prominence after organising events at locations including St James’s Palace. Its growth allowed Prince Andrew to hire more staff and to travel internationally after he was forced to resign as an official UK trade envoy in 2011.

PACT is currently in liquidation, along with the UK arm of Pitch@Palace. However, Pitch@Palace Global, the international arm, which reported nearly £600,000 in profits in the year ending March 2019, is expected to live on. It has removed all references to the prince from its website, and is working to “refresh the brand”.

Ms Thirsk, Prince Andrew’s private secretary since 2012 until January, is widely seen as having orchestrated the Newsnight interview last year about his links to Epstein. Intended to restore his reputation, the interview had the opposite effect, particularly because the prince declined to say that he regretted his friendship with the convicted sex offender.

PACT filed a serious incident report with the Charities Commission after the interview, after becoming “aware of the potential reputational risk by association”.


Copyright The Financial Times Limited . All rights reserved. Please don't copy articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

Content not loading? Subscribers can also read Prince Andrew repaid own charity after queries from regulator on ft.com